She and her husband had been married for 40 years, both now 73, navigating a blended family that included his two sons from a previous marriage, now in their early 50s, along with their shared daughter, 35. The relationship with her stepsons had never been entirely stable, marked by periods of no contact whenever they felt even slightly offended or disappointed by something. That dynamic had a transactional quality to it over the years, one shaped more by what had been done for them recently than by any consistent, unconditional connection.
Their mother and her second husband had also been married about 40 years, and that stepfather was financially comfortable, having provided significant support to both sons over time, including help with housing, vehicles, and other expenses along the way. That pattern of support from one side of the family seemed to have shaped her stepsons’ assumptions about the other side entirely, since they appeared to believe she and her husband had very little money to speak of.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
The Actual Numbers Behind the Assumption
In reality, she and her husband held approximately $2.5 million in combined investments and savings, along with the small condo they currently lived in. Their daughter, meanwhile, was financially successful and completely independent alongside her husband, needing no financial support from either parent going forward.
That gap, between what her stepsons assumed and what actually existed, mattered a great deal for how they were now approaching estate planning. Structuring a will thoughtfully required weighing not just the dollar amounts involved, but the very different nature of each relationship and each child’s actual financial circumstances heading into this next stage of their lives.
Five Grandchildren and a Plan Already Taking Shape
They had five grandchildren across the three adult children, and one piece of the plan already coming together involved providing each grandchild with monthly support for food and personal expenses while attending college or trade school. That approach offered a way to support the next generation directly and equally, regardless of how the relationships among the three adult children themselves had played out over the years.
Her husband’s first wife had left him for her second husband decades earlier, a history that added some additional context to the complicated relationship between him and his sons, one that had clearly been shaped by more than just recent disagreements or perceived slights.
Money That Isn’t Fully Shared Yet
Everything she and her husband had earned and saved during their 40 year marriage represented a genuinely joint effort, but she also held approximately $400,000 inherited recently from a cousin on her own side of the family, money that hadn’t yet been commingled with their marital assets, a separation her husband had specifically requested she maintain. That distinction gave her an additional layer to consider separately from the broader estate planning conversation, since inherited funds held apart from marital assets sometimes get treated differently depending on how a person ultimately chooses to distribute them.
A Family Spread Thin, With Little Connection Between Siblings
The two stepsons didn’t get along and had no real relationship with each other at all. Both maintained a semi-cordial relationship with their sister, though not one either side would describe as particularly close. All three lived on separate streets from one another, which meant they rarely crossed paths outside of family occasions, if even then.
That lack of closeness among the siblings added another layer to the planning conversation, since an estate plan doesn’t just distribute assets, it can also shape how family members interact with each other afterward, particularly in situations where relationships were already distant or strained well before any inheritance came into play.
Considering a Split That Reflects the Actual Relationships
One structure they’d started considering involved splitting the estate roughly in half, with one half going to their daughter and the other half divided in thirds among all three children equally. That approach acknowledged the difference between a daughter who’d remained closely connected and financially independent, and two stepsons whose relationship with their father had been considerably more distant and inconsistent over the decades, while still ensuring each of the three children received something meaningful regardless of the history involved.
That specific structure was still something they planned to discuss further with their financial advisors, rather than something already finalized, giving them room to adjust based on additional guidance about tax implications, trust structures, or other considerations that might affect how cleanly that kind of split could actually be executed.
Why Their Own Care Needs Come First
Underlying all of this was a clear priority they’d already settled on together, that their own retirement and potential long term care needs came before any inheritance planning entirely. At 73, with decades still potentially ahead of them, the reality was that neither of them could know for certain what, if anything, would remain by the time an estate actually needed to be distributed, particularly if either of them required extensive medical or long term care later in life.
That uncertainty meant any plan they put in place now needed to remain flexible enough to adjust as their own needs evolved, rather than locking in specific dollar amounts or percentages that might not reflect their actual financial reality years down the road.
Where They Stand Now
She and her husband were aligned throughout this process, working together to figure out what felt most equitable given the very different relationships each child had maintained with them over the decades, the different levels of financial need each child currently had, and the practical reality that their own care needs had to come first regardless of how the rest of the plan eventually took shape. What remained was refining the actual structure with professional guidance, translating their shared sense of fairness into a plan that held up practically, tax-wise, and legally once finalized.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: