She works from home, so a spike in her electric bill wasn’t something she was likely to miss, and this month’s bill came in noticeably higher than usual despite nothing changing in her own routine or usage. Her own habits hadn’t shifted at all, same work schedule, same appliances, same everything, which made the increase stand out immediately rather than blend into normal monthly variation.
The explanation turned up the next day when she went outside and found an extension cord plugged into the electrical outlet on her patio, running directly into the vacant apartment next door where contractors had been renovating for nearly three weeks. She unplugged it right away, and one of the workers told her the property manager had already given them permission to use that outlet.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
What the Property Manager Said When She Called
She called the management office to sort out what exactly had been happening, and their response treated the whole thing as a minor issue rather than something that had been quietly running up her bill for weeks. They described the usage as “only” powering tools, lights, fans, and drying equipment, as if that framing made it less significant than it actually was in terms of electricity drawn.
They offered her a $20 rent credit to resolve it, an amount that didn’t come close to matching what three weeks of running saws, work lights, and what sounded like a large floor dryer for most of the day would actually cost on an electric meter. Equipment like that draws meaningful power, especially when used consistently across full work days rather than in short bursts, and a flat $20 offer looked more like a number picked to make the conversation go away than one based on any actual calculation of usage.
Why This Matters More Given Her Budget
She’s currently on a tight budget while saving up to move, which means even a modest unexpected increase in a monthly bill isn’t something she can easily absorb without it affecting other plans. Money that was supposed to be going toward moving costs instead went toward electricity used entirely by contractors working on a completely separate unit, with zero benefit to her.
The outlet in question was connected directly to her own electric meter, not some shared building meter or common area circuit that tenants might reasonably expect landlords to draw from for maintenance purposes. That distinction matters a lot, since it meant every kilowatt used by the renovation crew was being billed specifically to her account rather than spread across the property or absorbed by the landlord directly.
The Permission That Never Happened
Nobody from the management office or the renovation crew asked her permission before running an extension cord to her patio outlet, despite the fact that outlet was tied to her individual electric service. The property manager giving contractors permission to use it doesn’t change who actually pays for the electricity that outlet pulls, since permission to plug in doesn’t come with permission to bill someone else’s meter.
That gap, between who authorized the usage and who ended up financially responsible for it, is really the core of the problem here. The property manager had the authority to grant access to the vacant unit and coordinate renovation work, but authorizing contractors to draw power from a tenant’s personal meter without that tenant’s knowledge or consent is a different matter entirely.
Why a Flat Credit Doesn’t Match the Actual Cost
A reasonable resolution would involve comparing this month’s electric bill directly against her typical usage from previous months to calculate the actual dollar increase caused by three weeks of construction equipment running through her outlet. That comparison would give a concrete number tied to real usage, rather than an arbitrary flat credit that has no clear connection to what actually happened.
Power tools, work lights, and industrial drying equipment used for extended periods across multiple weeks can add up to a substantial amount of electricity, especially compared to the light, steady draw of a typical residential setup. A $20 credit might cover a few hours of casual outlet use, but it doesn’t scale to match what sounds like near daily equipment use stretching across the better part of a month.
Making the Case for Full Reimbursement
Asking the landlord to reimburse the actual dollar difference between this month’s bill and her normal average usage is a far more defensible request than either accepting the flat credit or trying to estimate the cost herself without any documentation. Her utility provider can typically show monthly usage history, which would make it straightforward to identify exactly how much higher this billing cycle came in compared to her established baseline.
Framing the request around that comparison also shifts the conversation away from a vague debate about what feels fair and toward a specific number backed by her own billing records, something a property manager would have a harder time dismissing with another flat, arbitrary offer.
Where This Leaves Her
She hasn’t accepted the $20 credit yet, and given the mismatch between that offer and the actual scope of what was drawn from her outlet over three weeks, pushing for a reimbursement based on her real usage increase seems like the more reasonable path forward. Right now she’s weighing how firmly to push that request, especially while trying to keep her savings on track for an upcoming move that this whole situation has already put a small dent in.
What she still doesn’t know is whether the property manager will actually engage with a usage based comparison once she brings her billing history into the conversation, or whether this turns into another round of being offered a token amount that doesn’t reflect what actually happened to her electric bill over the last several weeks.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: