A few weeks ago, her husband’s mother called and asked for his Social Security number so she could search an unclaimed property website for money that might belong to family members. She found something in Kansas, a state her husband has not lived in since he was 11 years old, about 24 years ago. Now she is insisting he owes her half of whatever is recovered because she found it. The amount turned out to be $6,000. She wants $3,000.
There is some history attached to the money. His mother explained it had originally been set aside by his father for his education. Her husband joined the Navy to pay for college himself, received an honorable discharge, enrolled in culinary school, completed about two and a half semesters, and had to drop out after the VA billed him for an overpayment and said they had exceeded the education benefits they were willing to cover. He and his wife ended up working at Jimmy John’s to support themselves and their baby. The money his father had set aside for his education sat unclaimed in Kansas while all of that was happening.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
The $6,000 check arrived made out solely to her husband. Only he can deposit it. He will be responsible for any taxes on it. His mother is asking for half.
She had actually searched the same unclaimed property website for both of them a few months earlier but only checked states where they had lived as adults. It never occurred to her to search Kansas because her husband had not lived or worked there since childhood. His mother found the listing because she searched more broadly. The question she is sitting with is whether that makes her mother-in-law entitled to $3,000.
What the Unclaimed Property Actually Is
Unclaimed property in Kansas, like in most states, is money that has been turned over to the state after going unclaimed for a set period. It belongs to the person it was originally designated for, and that person can claim it by submitting the appropriate documentation. The state does not pay finders fees to people who locate listings on someone else’s behalf. Finding a listing online does not create a legal or financial interest in the money for the finder.
The check was made out to her husband. Not to his mother. Not jointly. To him. That is the state of Kansas confirming who the money belongs to. Her mother-in-law’s role in the process was identifying a listing and sharing it, which is something she could have done herself eventually, and which her mother-in-law chose to do after asking for his Social Security number under the framing of helping the family.
The Education Money Framing
The origin of the money as funds set aside by his father for his education adds a layer of complexity that probably explains why his mother feels she has some claim. But the logic does not follow. The money was set aside for his education, which means it was always intended for him. His father is still living and could have claimed it himself or directed it directly to his son at any point over the past 24 years. Instead it sat unclaimed until his mother found it on a website.
The fact that his education money went unused while he joined the military, had his VA benefits cut off unexpectedly, dropped out of culinary school, and worked at a sandwich shop to feed his family is not a point in favor of his parents’ claim to a portion of what he recovers. It is the backstory of why the money was never claimed in the first place.
The Millionaire Detail
Two months before this situation developed, his mother told them she and his father had officially become millionaires through their retirement accounts and investments. That context matters for evaluating what is actually happening here. A couple with seven-figure retirement savings asking for $3,000 from money their son is recovering from a childhood education fund is not a financial necessity. It is something else.
She is not saying this to be uncharitable. It is simply relevant context for understanding why the request feels off. The ask would be unusual under any circumstances. It is harder to understand when it comes from people who just announced they crossed into millionaire territory.
What Her Husband Can Do
He is not obligated to give his mother anything. The money is his, the check is in his name, and no agreement was made before the search that she would receive a portion of whatever was found. If she had proposed a finders fee arrangement upfront and he had agreed, that would be a different situation. She did not. She searched, found it, shared it, and is now asserting a claim to half.
He can choose to give her something as a gesture of appreciation if he wants to. That would be a gift, not a payment she is owed. He can also decline, and the only consequence would be his mother’s displeasure, which does not create a legal obligation.
The more important conversation is probably about what it means that his mother asked for his Social Security number under the banner of helping the family and then used that access to position herself for a financial claim on what she found.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: