Man changing lock on a door

He rents an apartment in Ohio, and a few weeks ago his building replaced every standard deadbolt with a smart lock system. He was not consulted about the upgrade, no tenant asked for it, and his old key worked fine. The change came with a notice that after the first 30 days, a $9.99 monthly access fee would be added to his rent to cover the app and maintenance of the new system.

Every door in the building now requires the app. That includes the front entrance, his individual apartment door, and the laundry room. Management has offered a physical backup code as an alternative to the app itself, but the monthly fee applies either way because the building has adopted the new system regardless of how individual tenants prefer to access it.

💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET

He earns income from livestreaming on Kick, so the fee itself is not a financial hardship. His frustration is about something else. It feels like another mandatory cost attached to a rental he already pays for, one he had no input on and cannot opt out of.

Where His Lease Comes In

The central legal question is whether his landlord can add a new monthly charge in the middle of an existing lease term. In Ohio, a lease is a binding contract, and the terms it contains are enforceable for the duration of the agreement. If his lease specifies what he owes each month and does not include language permitting the landlord to add new fees during the lease term, adding a $9.99 access charge without his consent may constitute a unilateral modification to the contract.

That does not mean the landlord cannot make changes to the building, but changes that come with new financial obligations for current tenants are a different matter from building upgrades that do not affect what tenants owe. He should pull out his lease and look specifically at the sections covering rent, fees, and any language about building policy changes or technology fees. If the lease is silent on this type of charge, he has a reasonable basis to dispute it.

How Ohio Tenant Law Applies

Ohio law does not provide the same level of tenant protection that some other states do, but it still requires that lease modifications be agreed to by both parties. A landlord cannot simply announce a new fee and begin collecting it if the existing lease does not authorize it. If he refuses to pay and the landlord tries to treat nonpayment as grounds for eviction, the landlord would need to show that the fee was a legitimate part of the lease or a properly executed modification.

He can contact the Ohio Attorney General’s consumer protection line or a local tenant assistance organization to ask how this type of fee addition is typically handled under state law. Some Ohio cities also have local tenant protections that go beyond state minimums, so his specific location within Ohio may matter.

The Opt-Out Problem

The part that makes this feel different from a standard rent increase is that he has no meaningful way to refuse the upgrade itself. The locks have already been changed. Every entry point in the building now requires the system. He cannot choose to keep using his old key because the old lock no longer exists. He is being charged for a service that was installed without his input and that he cannot decline to use without losing access to his own apartment.

That dynamic is part of what makes the fee feel less like a service and more like a condition of occupancy that was added after the fact. If a tenant cannot opt out of a system and cannot access their home without participating in it, charging them extra for that participation is a harder argument to justify than charging for a genuinely optional amenity.

What the Fee Actually Pays For

Management has framed the charge as covering the app and the maintenance of the smart lock system. That framing puts the cost of a building upgrade onto individual tenants on a recurring monthly basis. The landlord presumably made a business decision to invest in smart lock technology, and the $9.99 fee is a mechanism for recovering that cost over time by distributing it across tenants.

Whether that is a reasonable business practice is separate from whether it is legally permissible under an existing lease. Landlords make building improvements regularly, and tenants do not typically pay a monthly surcharge for the ongoing maintenance of improvements that were made to benefit the property as a whole.

What He Can Do Next

The most useful first step is a written response to management stating that he does not believe the fee is authorized under his current lease terms and asking them to identify the specific lease provision that permits the addition of a new monthly charge mid-tenancy. Putting that question in writing creates a record and often produces a more careful response than a verbal conversation.

If management insists the fee is valid and begins adding it to his balance, he can file a complaint with the Ohio Attorney General’s office and consult with a local tenant rights organization. He can also consult with a tenant-side attorney, many of whom offer free initial consultations, to assess whether he has grounds to formally dispute the charge or to negotiate a lease modification that includes agreed-upon terms for the new system.

The dollar amount is small, but the principle he identified is real. A landlord who can add fees in the middle of a lease without tenant consent can keep doing it, and a written challenge now creates documentation if the pattern continues.

Featured on Cents + Purpose: