She’d inherited her childhood home jointly with her brother years earlier, after their father deeded the property to both of them before he passed away. Their father had always expected them to keep the house, since neither sibling would agree to sell it while he was alive. The property itself wasn’t in a desirable area and wasn’t worth a large amount of money, but it carried significant sentimental weight for her personally.
After their father’s death, her brother wanted to sell the property right away. She asked if they could keep it instead, offering to personally cover all renovation costs, with the understanding that improving the property would increase its overall value over time. In the years since, she’d done extensive remodeling work, largely through her own labor combined with paying for materials out of pocket, leaving only a few major projects remaining, finishing part of the attic, refinishing some floors, and painting the exterior.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
An Inheritance That Split the Ownership Further
Her brother passed away two years ago, and his ownership share in the property passed to his two children. Those children had inherited substantial assets from their father separately, but they hadn’t contributed anything toward the house itself and didn’t seem particularly interested in helping maintain it going forward. She’d continued covering repairs and handling ongoing homeowner responsibilities on her own, and the property had increasingly become both a financial and emotional burden to manage alone.
That imbalance, her continuing to invest time and money into a property she now co-owned with two relatives who weren’t involved at all, sat at the center of several overlapping concerns she needed to sort through.
The Risk of Letting Maintenance Slide
She worried that if she stopped maintaining the property herself, it would begin losing value, particularly since she’d been the only one investing in its condition for years at this point. That concern was reasonable given the ownership structure, since any co-owner unwilling to contribute financially still holds an equal claim to whatever value the property retains, regardless of who’s actually been paying to preserve that value over time.
Whether Renovation Costs Get Recovered in a Sale
If the property were sold, she wanted to understand whether she could recover any of the money or value she’d personally invested in renovations over the years, especially given that those improvements had been funded and largely completed entirely by her. Generally, co-owners who’ve made improvements to shared property can seek reimbursement for those contributions during a sale or partition process, though the specifics depend heavily on documentation, receipts, timelines, and how clearly those investments can be tied to increased property value versus routine maintenance.
Without formal records of what had been spent and when, establishing that reimbursement claim could become more difficult, which made keeping thorough documentation of past and future expenses an important practical step regardless of how the ownership situation eventually resolved.
What Happens If the Co-Owners Disagree on Selling
She also wanted to understand her legal options if her nephews wanted to sell and she didn’t, or if she wanted to sell and they refused. In situations involving co-owned property where the parties can’t agree, a legal process called partition generally allows any co-owner to request that a court either divide the property or force a sale, with proceeds split according to each party’s ownership share. That option exists specifically for situations like this one, where shared ownership among multiple parties with different interests and priorities creates an impasse nobody can resolve informally.
The Capital Gains Question Tied to the Original Deed
She was also concerned about capital gains tax exposure if the property were sold, given that her father had originally deeded it to her and her brother for a nominal amount, $10, years earlier. Property received through a deed for a token amount rather than fair market value typically carries the original owner’s cost basis forward, rather than resetting to the property’s value at the time of the deed. That distinction matters significantly for tax purposes, since a low original cost basis combined with years of appreciation could mean a substantial capital gains liability upon sale, separate entirely from whatever renovation costs she might be able to recover.
Whether her brother’s death and the subsequent inheritance by his children affected the cost basis calculation for his portion specifically was a more technical question, since inherited property sometimes receives a stepped up basis reflecting its value at the time of death, which could create a meaningfully different tax situation for her nephews’ share compared to her own.
Separating the Ownership Entirely
She also wanted to know whether there was a legal way to separate the ownership structure entirely, so she and her nephews were no longer financially tied together through the property going forward. Depending on how the ownership was originally structured, options here could include one party buying out the other’s share, a formal partition action dividing or forcing the sale of the property, or a negotiated agreement establishing clearer terms for ongoing costs and eventual sale, assuming all parties were willing to cooperate on those terms.
What Kind of Attorney This Situation Calls For
Given the overlapping issues involved, property co-ownership disputes, potential partition action, and capital gains tax exposure tied to an inherited property with an unusual original cost basis, she was likely looking at needing input from both a real estate attorney familiar with North Carolina co-ownership and partition law, and a tax professional or accountant who could clarify exactly how the capital gains calculation would work given her father’s original deed and her brother’s later passing.
Real estate attorneys handling partition actions specifically would be best positioned to explain what forcing a sale or division might realistically look like given her specific ownership percentages and the property’s location and value, while a tax professional could model out the actual capital gains exposure under different sale scenarios before she made any final decisions about how to move forward.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: