They’re trying to plan ahead for a situation that feels predictable on paper but still comes with a lot of unknowns once you look closer.
A 78-year-old is moving into a continuing care facility, and as part of the process, she had to disclose everything she owns. Right now, she has about $700,000 in assets, and based on the facility’s projections, that amount should cover her care for the next 10 to 12 years. On its own, that timeline gives some level of stability, especially since the facility won’t force her to move if her funds run out. What complicates things is money that hasn’t arrived yet.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
A New Inheritance Is About to Change the Picture
Her brother recently passed away, and she’s expected to receive a few hundred thousand dollars from his estate. The exact amount and timing are still unclear, but it’s enough to shift her financial situation in a meaningful way.
That creates a new concern, because while the extra money could extend how long she can pay for care, she also wants to preserve as much of it as possible for her children. That’s where the question starts to come in, especially around whether there’s a way to protect those funds if she eventually needs additional support.
The Five-Year Lookback Is What’s Driving the Concern
When long-term care and Medicaid come into the conversation, the five-year lookback period becomes a key factor.
According to Medicaid, any transfers of assets made within five years of applying for Medicaid are reviewed to determine if money was given away or moved in a way that would affect eligibility.
That means any attempt to move or shield money has to be done carefully, because certain actions can trigger penalties or delays in coverage later.
Simply Moving the Money Isn’t a Solution
One of the first questions people ask in this situation is whether putting the money into a different account or a trust will protect it.
The issue is that most straightforward transfers don’t avoid the lookback rules. If assets are moved without receiving equal value in return, they can still be counted, even if they’re no longer in her direct possession. That includes many types of trusts, especially if they’re set up too late or structured in a way that still benefits the person financially. Because of that, timing and structure matter more than the act of moving the money itself.
The Facility’s Structure Adds Another Layer
Since she’s entering a continuing care community, the financial expectations are a little different than standard long-term care.
These facilities often calculate how long a resident’s assets should last and may continue providing care even after those funds are depleted. That reduces the immediate pressure to qualify for Medicaid right away, but it doesn’t eliminate the need to think about what happens if her situation changes down the line.
The inheritance could extend her ability to self-fund care, but it also increases the amount that could potentially be spent before any assistance would apply.
Protecting Assets and Planning Ahead Don’t Always Align
What she wants is understandable. She would like to preserve some of that inheritance for her children instead of using all of it for care.
The challenge is that long-term care systems are structured around using personal assets first. Trying to protect money while also planning for potential assistance later creates a conflict between those two goals.
That’s why strategies that seem simple often don’t work the way people expect once eligibility rules are applied.
The Timeline Still Works in Her Favor
Even with the added inheritance, there is one factor that works in her favor, and that’s time. If her current assets are expected to last 10 to 12 years, that already places her well beyond the five-year lookback window. That means decisions made now could have a different impact than they would in a shorter timeline, especially if she never needs to apply for Medicaid at all.
That doesn’t remove the need for careful planning, but it does create more flexibility than someone facing immediate care costs.
Professional Planning Becomes Critical
Situations like this tend to go beyond general financial advice. The combination of inheritance, long-term care, Medicaid rules, and family goals makes it important to look at the full picture before making any decisions. According to National Institute on Aging, working with professionals who understand elder law and long-term care planning is one of the most effective ways to avoid costly mistakes.
That kind of guidance helps ensure that any steps taken now align with both her financial situation and her long-term goals.
They’re Trying to Plan Before It Becomes Urgent
Right now, nothing is in crisis mode. She has the assets to cover her care, and the inheritance hasn’t even been received yet. What they’re trying to do is think ahead, so they’re not making rushed decisions later when options may be more limited.
That’s what makes this situation different, because the focus isn’t just on what to do with the money. It’s on how to balance care, timing, and family goals in a way that holds up over time.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: