She’d signed up for a gig work app to try to fill the gap, but the income coming from it was completely unpredictable week to week. One stretch might bring three jobs, the next twelve, then nothing at all the week after that. That kind of volatility makes budgeting nearly impossible, since there’s no way to plan around income that swings that widely from one week to the next.
Why the Standard Gig Work Advice Doesn’t Apply to Her
The common advice around gig work is to only accept jobs that are actually profitable once gas, mileage, and long term vehicle wear get factored in. That advice assumes a level of financial flexibility she simply didn’t have. If the only available gig paid $65, she had to take it, even knowing it barely broke even once the true cost of driving her aging car was factored in.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
The electric company wasn’t going to accept “the gig wasn’t profitable” as a reason for a missed payment, so the math that made sense on paper didn’t hold up against the reality of bills coming due regardless of what the numbers actually worked out to. She was, in effect, earning money today by slowly destroying the one asset she needed to keep earning money tomorrow, with no way around that tradeoff given her circumstances.
The Idea of a Medical Billing Course, and Why It’s Not a Full Fix
Her brother-in-law had thought about paying for an accelerated medical billing course, something that could eventually qualify her for a more stable remote position. But even fully funding the tuition wouldn’t resolve everything else stacked around it. She’d still need money for rent, utilities, food, gas, car repairs, and her kids’ needs while trying to complete a course on top of everything else already demanding her time.
She’d also still need to keep chasing gig work throughout that process just to survive month to month, which would leave less time and energy available for actually studying. And there was no guarantee a short certification would translate immediately into a remote job offer the moment she finished it, meaning the investment carried real risk without a guaranteed payoff at the end.
The Programs and Options Already Ruled Out
She’d already applied for most of the public assistance programs available in Alabama, and she hadn’t worked at the hospital long enough to qualify for unemployment benefits when that job ended. Moving somewhere with better job opportunities wasn’t realistic either, since relocating requires money she didn’t have, and living with family had already been attempted once before without success.
Each of those options represented a door that looked reasonable from the outside but had already closed for a specific, documented reason. That pattern, every standard solution running into a wall specific to her actual circumstances, was part of what made the whole situation feel like it kept resetting to the same starting point no matter what she tried next.
What Her Brother-in-Law Decided He Could Actually Do
He planned to send her $300 a month for three months, totaling $900 over that stretch. He was clear eyed about the fact that $900 wasn’t going to change her life or fix the underlying instability, but it would give her a small amount of breathing room in the short term. He was also honest with himself about the limits of what he could offer, permanently supporting another household financially simply wasn’t something he could sustain long term.
That gap, between wanting to help meaningfully and only being able to offer something temporary and partial, was its own source of frustration. Short term cash injections can ease immediate pressure without addressing any of the structural problems, stable childcare, reliable transportation, predictable income, that were actually keeping her stuck in the cycle to begin with.
Why Almost Every Suggested Solution Assumes Something She Doesn’t Have
‘What kept standing out to him was how often outside advice assumed she already had some baseline of stability to build from. Stable childcare. Reliable transportation. Savings to draw from. Free time and energy left over after a day of gig work and parenting. The ability to simply decline a bad opportunity while waiting for a better one to come along.
None of those assumptions held true for her situation, which meant most well meaning suggestions ended up circling back to advice that only works for someone who isn’t actually in crisis. Turning down an unprofitable gig requires having another option available, and she consistently didn’t have one.
The Bigger Pattern Underneath Her Situation
Poverty, in her case, didn’t look like a string of bad decisions leading to a bad outcome. It looked like every available option being objectively poor, and having to choose whichever one got her through the current day even when it made the following month harder. That’s a distinction that matters, since it shifts the explanation away from personal failure and toward a structural bind where each choice narrows the next set of options rather than expanding it.
A parent with two young children shouldn’t have to choose between destroying her only vehicle and missing a utility payment, but that was functionally the choice in front of her on a near constant basis. What she actually needed was consistent work, dependable childcare, reliable transportation, and enough financial breathing room to build toward something more stable, rather than another temporary patch that bought a few weeks before the same pressure returned.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: