The calls started without warning, and the framing of each one was designed to create urgency. ARM & Associates has been contacting him repeatedly about his estranged mother’s outstanding debt, describing every call as either an urgent change to your account or an urgent legal matter. He does not share a last name with his mother, she has never paid his phone bill, and he has no idea how a collection agency connected his number to her debt. He has answered several of the calls, explained clearly that they have the wrong person, and asked to be removed from their call list. They called again today.
His mother is estranged, he does not have a way to reach her, and he has no interest in being pulled into her financial situation. His main concerns are whether he has any legal obligation to pay her debt and how to make the calls stop.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
Whether He Actually Owes Anything
He does not. As a general rule, a person is not responsible for a parent’s debt simply by virtue of being related to them. Debt belongs to the person who agreed to it, which means his mother’s outstanding balance is her liability and hers alone. There is no circumstance under which a collection agency can legally require him to pay a debt he never signed for or agreed to in any form.
The only exceptions to that principle would involve situations where he co-signed a loan, held a joint account, or agreed in writing to take on responsibility for someone else’s debt. None of those apply here. The calls he is receiving are not a legal obligation being extended to him. They are a collection agency using his phone number, which may have been obtained through skip tracing or data broker records, in an attempt to locate or pressure his mother through someone connected to her.
What the Law Actually Requires From Collectors
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act governs the behavior of third-party debt collectors, and it contains specific protections for people in his situation. Under the FDCPA, collectors are prohibited from using false, deceptive, or misleading representations to collect a debt. Calling someone and describing the call as an urgent change to your account when there is no account and no relationship to the debt is exactly the kind of deceptive framing the law prohibits.
The FDCPA also gives him the right to send a written cease communication letter to the collection agency. Once they receive that letter, they are legally required to stop contacting him, with narrow exceptions for informing him that contact is ending or that a specific legal action is being pursued. Verbal requests to be removed from a call list carry less weight than a written notice, which is likely why the calls continued after he asked them to stop over the phone.
How to Send the Cease Communication Letter
He should send a letter via certified mail with return receipt requested to ARM & Associates, addressed to their compliance department if possible. The letter does not need to be long or formal. It should state his name, that he is not the debtor, that he has no relationship to the debt, and that he is formally requesting that all contact cease immediately under the provisions of the FDCPA. Keeping a copy of the letter and the certified mail receipt is essential documentation if the calls continue after delivery.
If the agency contacts him again after receiving the letter, that contact may constitute a violation of federal law. At that point, he has grounds to file a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission, and potentially to consult with a consumer protection attorney. FDCPA violations can result in statutory damages up to $1,000 per violation, plus attorney fees, which means consumer protection attorneys often take these cases on contingency.
How They Got His Number
The most likely explanation is skip tracing, which is the process collection agencies use to locate debtors by cross-referencing phone records, public data, and commercial data broker databases. His number was probably connected to his mother through some shared record, perhaps a previous address, a family member listing, or a data broker that linked the two names despite the different last names. He did not give his number to the agency and his mother did not provide it directly. It was pulled from a database that associated them in some way.
That process is common and not necessarily illegal on its own, but using that information to contact a third party repeatedly after being told the connection is wrong and being asked to stop crosses into territory the FDCPA is designed to address.
What to Do Right Now
The most effective immediate steps are to stop answering calls from the agency’s number, send the written cease communication letter by certified mail, and document every call he receives going forward including the date, time, and any content of the call. If the calls continue after delivery of the letter, he should file complaints with the CFPB at consumerfinance.gov and with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov. Both agencies accept complaints about FDCPA violations and use that data to identify patterns and pursue enforcement actions against agencies that repeatedly ignore consumer rights.
He has no obligation to pay this debt, no obligation to track down his mother, and no obligation to continue receiving calls about a financial situation that has nothing to do with him.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: