A few years ago she found a wallet in a grocery store parking lot. It had cash, several cards, and the owner’s ID inside. She stood there for a moment knowing exactly what the right thing to do was, and then she put the wallet in her bag and walked to her car.
She wasn’t desperate for money. She didn’t have a reason that would hold up under any real scrutiny. What she had was a quick rationalization, that someone else would probably keep it anyway, and that was enough to get her moving in the wrong direction. She spent the cash over the next few days. Then she threw the wallet away because having the owner’s ID and cards in her possession made the guilt harder to ignore, and removing them from sight was easier than sitting with what she’d done.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
She’s thought about it since then, particularly on the occasions when she’s lost something important and found herself hoping whoever found it does the right thing. The irony, as she puts it, isn’t lost on her. She genuinely regrets it and wishes she had made the obvious decent choice instead.
The rationalization that did the work
The someone else would have kept it anyway logic is one of the most common ways people talk themselves into decisions they already know are wrong. It reframes a personal ethical choice as a foregone conclusion, suggesting that the outcome was already determined and the only question was which stranger would benefit. It also has the convenient effect of making the decision feel less like a decision, more like simply being realistic about human nature.
The problem with the logic is that it’s not actually about human nature. Studies on lost wallet returns consistently show that a substantial portion of people return lost wallets, particularly when ID is present and the owner can be identified. The someone else would keep it assumption isn’t an accurate read of what most people do. It’s a story that made the choice easier to make in the moment.
Throwing away the wallet was the second decision
The guilt she felt when she saw the owner’s information is the part worth sitting with. That discomfort was her conscience recognizing the full picture, a real person whose name and face were on that ID, who would spend days on the phone canceling cards and replacing a license because of a choice she made in a parking lot. Throwing the wallet away didn’t resolve the discomfort. It just removed the specific trigger while leaving the underlying knowledge intact, which is why she still thinks about it years later.
The decision to discard the wallet also made the harm irreversible in a way that keeping it wouldn’t have. As long as the wallet existed, there was a theoretical path back to doing the right thing. Once it was gone, that possibility closed.
What the owner actually went through
She named this herself and it’s worth saying plainly. The person who lost that wallet had to cancel every card, wait for replacements, update any automatic payments attached to those accounts, replace a driver’s license through a DMV process that takes time and sometimes costs money, and manage whatever stress and disruption follows from losing your identification and financial tools at once. That’s not a minor inconvenience. For some people, depending on their circumstances, losing a wallet creates a cascading set of problems that takes more than days to fully resolve.
She wasn’t desperate. She had no real justification. She just wanted the cash and found a story that made taking it feel less like what it was.
The irony she identified
There’s something clarifying about the moments when she’s lost something and hoped it would be returned. In those moments she’s not thinking about what percentage of finders are honest. She’s thinking about the specific person who has whatever she lost and whether they’ll choose to help her. That’s the same position the wallet’s owner was in, hoping the specific person who found it would make the obvious decent choice. The difference is that she knows how her version of that story ended.
Regret that stays with someone for years and surfaces specifically when they’re in a position to want the same decency extended to them is regret that’s doing its job. It doesn’t undo anything, but it’s honest in a way that matters.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: