Woman looking upset as she looks at a bill

His wife started collecting Social Security about a year ago because she’s older than he is. When he turned 62 last October he started collecting his own benefits at the earliest possible age, and shortly after that his wife contacted Social Security to ask whether his claim would affect her payment. Based on their understanding of the rules, since his monthly benefit is higher than hers, she appeared to qualify for a spousal benefit adjustment that would bring her payment up to reflect a portion of his. They spoke with a Social Security representative directly, followed the instructions they were given, and for about six months everything seemed fine.

Then a letter arrived telling his wife she’d been overpaid by approximately $1,900 over a two-month period because of that benefit adjustment and that the money needed to be repaid. They hadn’t made any changes themselves online or tried to interpret the rules independently. They had called, spoken to an actual representative, and done exactly what they were told to do. Now they’re being asked to send back money they received based on guidance from the agency’s own staff, and they don’t have an extra $1,900 sitting around to do it.

💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET

This is a known problem with Social Security administration

Social Security overpayments caused by agency error or incorrect guidance from representatives are not rare, and the situation he’s describing, following staff instructions and receiving a repayment demand months later, is a documented pattern. The agency’s own inspector general has repeatedly flagged overpayment recovery practices as a source of significant hardship for beneficiaries, particularly when the overpayment resulted from the agency’s own mistakes rather than anything the recipient did wrong.

The important thing to understand is that receiving an overpayment notice is not the end of the process. It’s the beginning of one, and there are formal steps available to them that can reduce, delay, or eliminate the repayment obligation depending on the circumstances.

Requesting a waiver is the most important immediate step

Social Security has a waiver process specifically for situations where an overpayment wasn’t the fault of the recipient and where repayment would cause financial hardship. Both conditions appear to apply here. They contacted the agency, received guidance from a representative, and followed it. The overpayment resulted from how that guidance was applied, not from anything they did independently or incorrectly. And they’ve already indicated that they don’t have $1,900 available to repay without hardship.

A waiver request needs to be filed using Form SSA-632, and it should be filed as soon as possible because there are deadlines attached to the overpayment notice. Filing the waiver doesn’t mean they’re admitting the overpayment was wrong. It means they’re formally asking Social Security to review whether recovery is appropriate given the circumstances. If the waiver is granted, they owe nothing. If it’s partially granted, they may owe a reduced amount or be placed on a repayment plan that doesn’t require a lump sum.

Appealing the overpayment determination itself is also an option

Separate from the waiver, they can also appeal the overpayment determination directly if they believe the calculation is wrong or that the spousal benefit adjustment was actually applied correctly. An appeal requests that Social Security review whether the overpayment finding itself is accurate, while a waiver accepts that an overpayment occurred but asks for relief from having to pay it back. Both can be pursued simultaneously, and filing either one typically pauses any collection activity while the request is under review.

They should request a copy of the documentation Social Security used to calculate the overpayment so they can verify the math and understand exactly what period and what benefit amounts are being disputed.

Documenting the representative interaction matters here

The fact that they spoke directly with a Social Security representative and followed the guidance they were given is central to both the waiver and any appeal. If they have any records of that interaction, including dates, names of representatives, reference numbers from calls, or anything written that came out of the contact, those should be gathered and included with any paperwork they file. Social Security keeps records of beneficiary contacts, and a request for those records as part of the waiver or appeal process can help establish that they acted in good faith based on official guidance.

If the representative gave them incorrect information that caused the overpayment, that shifts responsibility toward the agency in a way that strengthens their waiver case considerably.

Featured on Cents + Purpose: