At 75, he’s not dealing with a complicated financial portfolio or a long list of assets. He’s dealing with a single problem that feels bigger than everything else, and that’s a $10,000 credit card debt that has now turned into a lawsuit.
He doesn’t own a home or have a car. He rents and lives on Social Security, which already limits what he can realistically do to respond. Now he’s trying to figure out whether he needs to take action or if doing nothing will protect him.
💸 Take Back Control of Your Finances in 2025 💸
Get Instant Access to our free mini course
5 DAYS TO A BETTER BUDGET
His Main Income Source Has Legal Protections
One of the first things he learned is that Social Security income has strong protections under federal law. Creditors generally cannot garnish Social Security benefits to collect on credit card debt, which removes one of the biggest fears people have in situations like this.
According to the Social Security Administration, Social Security benefits are protected from most creditors, including credit card companies. That protection applies whether the money is received by direct deposit or check, which means his primary income stream is not something they can take directly.
Bank Accounts Still Create Some Risk
Even though the income itself is protected, the bank account where that money sits can still become part of the issue.
Federal rules require banks to automatically protect up to two months’ worth of Social Security deposits if a creditor attempts to freeze an account. That means the bank is supposed to identify those funds and leave them accessible.
The concern is that there can still be a delay while the bank verifies the source of the funds, which can temporarily limit access even if the money is ultimately protected.
A Lawsuit Can Still Lead to a Judgment
Even if his income is protected, the lawsuit itself doesn’t just go away. If he does nothing and doesn’t respond, the court can issue a default judgment against him. That judgment gives the creditor more legal options to try to collect, even if those options are limited by his situation.
That’s why ignoring it completely can still create problems, even if they can’t take his Social Security directly.
Wage Garnishment Isn’t the Main Issue Here
Since he’s retired and living on Social Security, traditional wage garnishment isn’t really part of the equation.
Credit card companies can only garnish wages from employment income, not Social Security benefits. That distinction matters because it limits what the creditor can realistically pursue in his case.
Bankruptcy May Not Be the Only Option
He’s been told to consider bankruptcy, but the cost is what’s stopping him. Filing can run close to $1,000 or more, which is a significant amount when you’re living on a fixed income. That makes it feel out of reach, even if it could potentially resolve the debt.
In situations like his, it may be worth looking into free or low-cost legal aid, since many organizations offer help specifically for seniors dealing with debt lawsuits.
The Bigger Question Is What They Can Actually Collect
The reality is that even with a judgment, creditors are limited by what he owns. He doesn’t have property, vehicles, or significant assets that could be seized. His income is protected, and his bank balance is below the protected threshold.
That doesn’t mean the situation disappears, but it does change what the creditor can realistically recover.
Why Taking Some Action Still Matters
Even with those protections, responding to the lawsuit can help prevent unnecessary complications. Filing a response or seeking legal guidance can slow the process, clarify what the creditor can and cannot do, and reduce the risk of account issues or confusion later on.
Doing nothing may feel easier in the moment, but it can lead to a judgment that makes the situation harder to manage, even if the financial impact is limited.
He’s Trying to Avoid Making a Costly Decision in a Tight Situation
At this stage, the decision isn’t just about the debt itself. He’s weighing the cost of bankruptcy, the risk of account issues, and the stress of dealing with the court system, all while living on a fixed income that doesn’t leave much room for error.
The good news is that his primary income is protected, and his lack of assets limits what creditors can take. The challenge is figuring out how to move forward in a way that protects what he has without adding new financial strain.
Featured on Cents + Purpose: